Is Things to Come Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Things to Come is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 100 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Things to Come is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Yes, Things to Come is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 100 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1936, Things to Come emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of The story of a century: a decades-long second World War leaves plague and anarchy, then a rational state rebuilds civilization and attempts space travel. Unlike standard genre fare, Things to Come attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Things to Come features a noteworthy lineup led by Raymond Massey . Supported by the likes of Edward Chapman and Ralph Richardson , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Things to Come (1936) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Things to Come is a Drama, Science Fiction film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Things to Come concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Things to Come reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:









Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.5/10, and global collection metrics, Things to Come stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1936 cinematic year.
Things to Come has received mixed reviews with a 6.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Things to Come is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Science Fiction movies, but read reviews first.
Things to Come may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
This is a rather fanciful adaptation of the HG Wells tale. Mankind is all but obliterated by war; reduced to tribal existences - under the overly theatrical leadership of Ralph Richardson and Margaretta Scott - fighting plague, tyranny and the elements. Then they encounter Daniel Massey ("John Cabal") who helps reconcile and rebuild society to an almost Utopian level. It manages to intertwine megalomania with human aspiration; an overpoweringly rousing score and some truly Shakesperian style soliloquy. It comes to force a future upon us that is eerily portentous of an Orwellian style dictatorship; of interstellar exploration to spread our plague of self-destructive ambition to other worlds - and all, broadly speaking with the consent of the masses. Sadly, i saw a colourised version which robbed this film of almost every element of potency; indeed it rendered it little better than a very poor cartoon. It's still just about worth watching; but Massey is no Olivier and I found it all rather preposterous.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.