Is Thirteen at Dinner Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Thirteen at Dinner is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Thirteen at Dinner is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Mystery genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Thirteen at Dinner is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1985, Thirteen at Dinner emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Mystery domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Actress Jane Wilkinson wants a divorce, but her husband, Lord Edgware, refuses. Unlike standard genre fare, Thirteen at Dinner attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Thirteen at Dinner features a noteworthy lineup led by Peter Ustinov . Supported by the likes of Faye Dunaway and Jonathan Cecil , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Thirteen at Dinner (1985) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Thirteen at Dinner is a Crime, Mystery film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Thirteen at Dinner attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Thirteen at Dinner reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Thirteen at Dinner incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, mystery film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Thirteen at Dinner adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Fandango At Home
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.7/10, and global collection metrics, Thirteen at Dinner stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1985 cinematic year.
Thirteen at Dinner has received mixed reviews with a 5.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Thirteen at Dinner is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Mystery movies, but read reviews first.
Thirteen at Dinner may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise