Is This Gun for Hire Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, This Gun for Hire is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 81 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:This Gun for Hire is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.0/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Crime, Thriller, Mystery genre.
Answer: Yes, This Gun for Hire is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 81 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1942, This Gun for Hire emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Thriller, Mystery domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Sadistic killer-for-hire Philip Raven becomes enraged when his latest job is paid off in marked bills. Unlike standard genre fare, This Gun for Hire attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and This Gun for Hire features a noteworthy lineup led by Veronica Lake . Supported by the likes of Robert Preston and Laird Cregar , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of This Gun for Hire (1942) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: This Gun for Hire is a Crime, Thriller, Mystery film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: This Gun for Hire resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to crime resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of This Gun for Hire reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
This Gun for Hire incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, thriller, mystery film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film balances historical fidelity with cinematic storytelling. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
The production demonstrates respect for its source material, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: This Gun for Hire adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $512.4K |
| Worldwide Gross | $1.0M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for This Gun for Hire is $512.4K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7/10, and global collection metrics, This Gun for Hire stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1942 cinematic year.
This Gun for Hire is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Crime, Thriller, Mystery movies.
Yes, This Gun for Hire is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Crime, Thriller, Mystery cinema.
This Gun for Hire may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
I like Cats! So says the icy cold broken wrist killer! Phillip Raven is a hit man of no obvious moral fibre, he literally will kill anyone for the right price. After fulfilling a contract for the chocolate munching Willard Gates, he finds himself pursued by the law on account that he was paid by Gates with stolen money. Raven sets out for the ultimate revenge and dovetailing towards the explosive finale with him is sultry conjurer Ellen Graham and honest cop Michael Crane. Based on the Graham Greene novel "A Gun For Sale", this is not a straight out adaptation, the plot has been re-jigged with very impressive results. The most enlightening thing I found when reading up on the film was that the studio were so blown away by the efforts of Alan Ladd as Raven, they turned the script around to make him the film's chief axis, and boy what a smart move that was for this is Alan Ladd's show all the way. Ladd plays Raven with brilliant icy veneer, he's cold and devoid of emotion, his only trip to anything resembling caring is an affinity to cats - because in his own words, "cats don't need anyone, they are on their own, just like me", the result is one of the most unnerving killers put on to the 40s cinema screens. Veronica Lake is the stunning female of the piece, she glides through the picture with ease as Ellen, a character with her own issues, but thankfully she's integral outside of any sort of romantic plot, even though she is the only one who gets close enough to Raven to learn anything about what makes him tick. Robert Preston as Michael Crane was to be the pics focus but he becomes a mere side part thanks to Ladd's barnstorming show, and unsurprisingly Laird Cregar is suitably shifty as Gates. It's a fine film in its own right, it's tightly filmed, wonderfully scripted and contains a great noir ending, but ultimately it's all about the cold as death hit-man Raven - and of course the great performance by the man who played him. 8.5/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.