Performance & Direction: This Is Not a Test Review
Last updated: January 22, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is This Is Not a Test (1962) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.6/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and This Is Not a Test features a noteworthy lineup led by Seamon Glass . Supported by the likes of Thayer Roberts and Aubrey Martin , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of This Is Not a Test (1962) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: This Is Not a Test
Quick Plot Summary: This Is Not a Test is a Drama, Action, Thriller, Science Fiction film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: This Is Not a Test
Ending Breakdown: This Is Not a Test attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of This Is Not a Test reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch This Is Not a Test?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Drama films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: This Is Not a Test
All Cast & Crew →




Where to Watch This Is Not a Test Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
CultpixThis Is Not a Test Parents Guide & Age Rating
1962 AdvisoryWondering about This Is Not a Test age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of This Is Not a Test is 73 minutes (1h 13m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, This Is Not a Test stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1962 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is This Is Not a Test worth watching?
This Is Not a Test is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 5.6/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find This Is Not a Test parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for This Is Not a Test identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of This Is Not a Test?
The total duration of This Is Not a Test is 73 minutes, which is approximately 1h 13m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked This Is Not a Test
How This Is Not a Test Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for This Is Not a Test
It has always intrigued me how cinema reflects its times--nothing demonstrates that to me more passionately than the doomsday scenario of nuclear apocalypse in movies, particularly during the times of extreme political crisis between the USA and then-USSR in both the 60's and 80's. 'This Is Not a Test' was director Fredric Gadette's lone work as director, producer and scriptwriter, and he's able to make, with a small set, a truck, a few cars, 17 no-name actors and a dog, an intriguing and moderately suspenseful genre entry. He utilizes a few nice gimmicks to make it more enjoyable--a murderer on the loose, a couple who should have divorced probably a decade ago, a lost rifle--some hilarious parts (what good is canned grapefruit juice if you don't have a can opener, and what 'discount world' sells mink coats?), and all tolled, it's a fine, low-budget 73 minutes that make me honestly wish Mr. Gadette had made a lot more movies. (Cinephiles, this is readily available for a fine price in Mill Creek's 50-film set called 'Nightmare Worlds'. Don't say I didn't tell ya!) =)
KING OF THE SWITCH ENDINGS A highway patrolman stops a few cars for an emergency. "This is Not a Test" refers to that emergency. It isn't a test. It's a real nuclear attack. A motley group of seemingly ordinary people deal with the fact that they are in what they consider "Ground Zero", smack dab between some obvious targets. Except there's a wild card in the mix. One of the people in this story is a homicidal maniac. And that's where the switch ending comes in. Things are not what they seem. A very low budget film, with the biggest name being Ron Starr, whose only other big film was Peckinpah's confirmed masterpiece "Ride the High Country". This film delivers, though, in the end, although there is a suicide during the movie that seems a bit contrived, but other than that, this is a very good screenplay, and it's good drama and good theater. Although there isn't a lot of action, there is a lot of animation and the appearance of action that keeps the viewer glued to the story.
I suppose the writing was on the wall for this with the opening titles. No mention at all of the acting "talent" but at least four of Frederic Gadette who appears to have done all but make the coffee. The plot sees a single police officer "Colter" (Seamon Glass) being charged with operating a roadblock on a remote highway. That's my first problem. He is stop both directions at the same spot - there is no accident, he is not inspecting the vehicles and when asked why by the surprisingly high number of travellers, he could hardly be less informative. Anyway, it soon transpires that the USA is under a nuclear attack and the film now attempts to deal with just how folks would deal; in the middle of nowhere, in the middle of the night, with that information. The budget went on the coffee, if there was one. It is shockingly badly lit; the dialogue is barely audible and the characterisations - especially toward the end of this overlong 80 minute endeavour - fall flat every time. The acting is pedestrian, and what could have provided an interesting insight into human behaviour when facing imminent annihilation, just turned into a pretty badly presented affair with little to redeem it. It's not a bad idea, but the execution is really very poor.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









