Is Three Strangers Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Three Strangers is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Three Strangers is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Thriller, Crime genre.
Answer: Yes, Three Strangers is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1946, Three Strangers emerges as a significant entry in the Thriller, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of On the eve of the Chinese New Year, three strangers, Crystal Shackleford, married to a wealthy philanderer; Jerome Artbutny, an outwardly respectable judge; and Johnny West, a seedy sneak thief, make a pact before a small statue of the Chinese goddess of Destiny. Unlike standard genre fare, Three Strangers attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Thriller is often anchored by its ensemble, and Three Strangers features a noteworthy lineup led by Sydney Greenstreet . Supported by the likes of Geraldine Fitzgerald and Peter Lorre , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Three Strangers (1946) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Three Strangers is a Thriller, Crime film that builds tension through unpredictable twists and keeps audiences guessing until the final reveal. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Three Strangers concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to thriller resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Three Strangers reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Three Strangers incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a thriller, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Three Strangers adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:










Amazon Video
Apple TV
Amazon Video
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.4/10, and global collection metrics, Three Strangers stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1946 cinematic year.
Three Strangers has received mixed reviews with a 6.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Three Strangers is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Thriller, Crime movies, but read reviews first.
Three Strangers may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Three strangers, one idol and one sweepstake ticket. Bad mix. Three Strangers is directed by Jean Negulesco and written by John Huston and Howard Koch. It stars Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre and Geraldine Fitzgerald. Music is by Adolph Deutsch and cinematography by Arthur Edeson. A tricky movie in structure as it constantly shifts between three character arcs to lead us to its resolution. Plot finds Crystal (Fitzgerald) luring Johnny (Lorre) and Arbutny (Greenstreet) to her apartment to make a wish in front of a Chinese idol known as Kwan Yin. It’s believed that Kwan Yin will bring a wish true if requested by three strangers at midnight. They mutually agree on purchasing a lottery ticket and vow to split the winnings evenly. Naturally things don’t go as planned… The key issue here is that the three characters are tainted by their weaknesses, so as greed, paranoia, bad luck and jealousy grips their respective lives, Kwan Yin deals them the cards they deserve. Negulesco and his writers give the actors meaty parts, thrusting the characters into a world of embezzlement, murder, imprisonment and alcoholism. The vagaries of fate shows its hand as well, and with Edeson’s black and white photography cosying up to the thematics, pic rounds out as a thriller cum drama with added mysticism for good measure. Huston’s noir shadings are evident, and since it was written before it, this makes for a good appetiser to The Maltese Falcon. Good fun to be had here and the final outcome for our three strangers doesn’t disappoint either. 7.5/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.