Is Thriller: A Cruel Picture Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Thriller: A Cruel Picture is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Thriller: A Cruel Picture is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Thriller, Crime, Horror genre.
Answer: Yes, Thriller: A Cruel Picture is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1973, Thriller: A Cruel Picture emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Thriller, Crime, Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Madeleine, rendered mute after being sexually assaulted as a youth, accepts a lift from a wealthy and sadistic pimp who soon enslaves her into his prostitution racket. Unlike standard genre fare, Thriller: A Cruel Picture attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Thriller: A Cruel Picture features a noteworthy lineup led by Christina Lindberg . Supported by the likes of Heinz Hopf and Solveig Andersson , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Thriller: A Cruel Picture (1973) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Thriller: A Cruel Picture is a Action, Thriller, Crime, Horror film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Thriller: A Cruel Picture concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Thriller: A Cruel Picture reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Thriller: A Cruel Picture incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a action, thriller, crime, horror film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Thriller: A Cruel Picture adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:






CultpixAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.4/10, and global collection metrics, Thriller: A Cruel Picture stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1973 cinematic year.
Thriller: A Cruel Picture has received mixed reviews with a 6.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Thriller: A Cruel Picture is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Action, Thriller, Crime movies, but read reviews first.
Thriller: A Cruel Picture is currently available for streaming on Cultpix. You can also check for it on platforms like Cultpix depending on your region.
Madeline Marauds! Exploitation cinema in all its glory, or not, depending on your own personal peccadilloes! Directed, written and produced by Bo Arne Vibenius, Thriller - en grym film (AKA: They Call Her One Eye) is an infamous picture for a number of reasons, reasons that would take a whole page to write about. So use your mouse and google it because this review isn't interested in dabbling in such fare. Plot sees a young Madeline raped by a paedophile and rendered mute by the experience. Into early adulthood and Madeline (played superbly by soft core porn starlet Christinia Lindberg) unwisely takes up the offer of a lift from the odious Tony (Heinz Hopf). Pretty soon she's addicted to heroin and working as a prostitute. However, Madeline is biding her time, for she has plans, plans that spell doom for all her abusers. Does this film have artistic merit? Absolutely! In fact if you take out the inserted pornographic close-ups, which are pointless since we already know what Madeline is going through (a supposed marketing tool of the era apparently...) then this is a kick-ass film. It's a two parter, where the first half shows all of Madeline's misery, with sexual disturbance and body horror, then we switch to Madeline's fight back, where we get one of the coolest anti-heroines of 70s exploitation. She's sporting an eye patch, a glorious black trench coat, and weapons, oh yes! There are weapons, hands, guns and cars, oh my! It's here where Vibenius asks the question about justifiable revenge, whilst the super slow-mo approach to the violence will either be viewed as indulgent or classy (I'm with the latter camp). It is what it is, grungy and grimy, operating in a specialist niche of cinema, but worthy in that it didn't conform, and it has proved influential. It's just not a date movie or something to watch with you mom! Right, I'm off for a bath. 7/10
Okay rape-revenge thriller has a fine performance from Christina Lindberg even though she has zero lines and there are scenes tough to watch. The revenge portion is the best part however the slow-motion fight between Madeliene and the cops went on far too long. The final scene was satisfying though. **3.5/5**
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.