Is Time Under Fire Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Time Under Fire is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 82 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Time Under Fire is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction, Action genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Time Under Fire is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 82 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1997, Time Under Fire emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction, Action domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A US submarine runs into a time rift. Unlike standard genre fare, Time Under Fire attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Time Under Fire features a noteworthy lineup led by Jeff Fahey . Supported by the likes of Richard Tyson and Jack Coleman , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Time Under Fire (1997) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Time Under Fire is a Science Fiction, Action film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Time Under Fire attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Time Under Fire reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:






Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5/10, and global collection metrics, Time Under Fire stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1997 cinematic year.
Time Under Fire has received mixed reviews with a 5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Time Under Fire is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Science Fiction, Action movies, but read reviews first.
Time Under Fire is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
Well you could never accuse the team behind this of not having grown up watching movies. Just about everything from “Return of the Jedi” to “The Hunt for Red October” via “Terminator” and that terrible “Amazing Captain Nemo” film from 1978 is creatively incorporated into this. It’s a US Navy submarine that unwisely ignores advice to avoid the Bermuda Triangle and finds itself transported one hundred years into a future ruled by a militarist and his stormtroopers. He is working on the ultimate weapon - an android who just happens to look like the captain of the submarine, which has in the intervening few moments of plot development, been captured. Of course, the now imprisoned crew decide that they have to thwart this dastardly plan, but are hopelessly outnumbered and outgunned by this vastly technologically superior society. So what do we reckon, then? It’s actually quite impressive that Messrs. Levy and Reed have managed to string this thinnest of stories out for ninety minutes, but they do save the best for last with some great robot effects. Anyone else remember that tinned “Cremola Foam” stuff you made with water? The acting and writing don’t merit any comment beyond the fact that they are there; there’s a bit of entirely unnecessary sex and sadly this is no better than a low-budget film made to plug a gap in the sci-channel’s overnight schedules. Skip it, sorry.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.