Is To Dream Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, To Dream is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 80 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:To Dream is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama genre.
Answer: Yes, To Dream is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 80 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2016, To Dream emerges as a significant entry in the Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Two dysfunctional London teens rely heavily upon their friendship, but their rough family dynamics lead them to making a life-changing decision. Unlike standard genre fare, To Dream attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and To Dream features a noteworthy lineup led by Billy Barratt . Supported by the likes of Jayson Benovichi Dicken and Jon Campling , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of To Dream (2016) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: To Dream is a Drama film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: To Dream concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of To Dream reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:









Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.5/10, and global collection metrics, To Dream stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.
To Dream has received mixed reviews with a 6.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
To Dream is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama movies, but read reviews first.
To Dream may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
This did have some potential, if only we could have heard what was being said! The audio recording and mixing is terrible. That’s not just a gripe, it actually means that half the time we are left to guess what “Luke” (Edward Hayter) and lifelong friend “Tommy” (Freddie Thorp) are saying and at times that is just plain irritating. These two men have a dream. That is to escape the mundanity and hopelessness of their London existence and head to America. The latter lad is a bit reckless, and is gradually becoming subsumed into a world of pretty crime and drug dealing. The only thing that holds him back is his devotion for his friend. “Luke” lives with his parents, is regularly thumped by his dad and has a girlfriend “Nikki” (Diana Vickers) with whom he struggles to quite commit, if you see what I mean. Anyway, “Tommy” isn’t a fan of her, indeed the green eyed monster is never far away and ultimately that leads him to start a domino effect of lies that could well have perilous consequences for just about everyone. It’s really a short story, this, and though both Hayter and Thorp work well enough when they are together on screen, the rest of this struggles to stand out amongst a slew of gritty London street dramas that (homo)sexualises a plot that we’ve seen plenty of times before. It’s clearly been done of a minimal budget and the visuals work fine, as does the thrust of a story of blind loyalty and irresponsibility, but once it’s set up the plot simply runs out of steam. In some ways it reminded me of “Shank” (2009) only not as characterful or gritty.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.