Performance & Direction: Triassic World Review
Last updated: January 22, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Triassic World (2018) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 3.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Action.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Triassic World features a noteworthy lineup led by Shellie Sterling . Supported by the likes of Hayley J Williams and Joseph Michael Harris , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Triassic World (2018) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Triassic World
Quick Plot Summary: Triassic World is a Action, Horror, Science Fiction film that delivers highly intense sequences and pulse-pounding confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Triassic World
Ending Breakdown: Triassic World attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the action themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Triassic World reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Triassic World?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Action films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Triassic World
All Cast & Crew →





Where to Watch Triassic World Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Amazon Prime Video
fuboTV
Amazon Prime Video with Ads🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home🏷️ Buy on
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeTriassic World Parents Guide & Age Rating
2018 AdvisoryWondering about Triassic World age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Triassic World is 90 minutes (1h 30m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 3.2/10, and global collection metrics, Triassic World stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2018 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Triassic World worth watching?
Triassic World is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies. It has a verified rating of 3.2/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Triassic World parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Triassic World identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Triassic World?
The total duration of Triassic World is 90 minutes, which is approximately 1h 30m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Triassic World
How Triassic World Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Triassic World
**Overall Grade**: 2.05/5, C-, .5 Stars Generally, I like movies from The Asylum, and I can put up with a lot of bad movies. This movie, however, was just terrible. I could not find anything in this movie that I would consider redeemable, and I _Jurassic Prey_ a B+. This movie was just bad. **Storyline (1/5)**: The general idea of the movie, if they had actually done anything with it, was that a company wanted to use dinosaurs to create replacement body parts for humans. Interesting idea... that they did absolutely nothing with. Instead, they chose to go with a story about dinosaurs getting loose in a laboratory and just killing everyone, which would generally be okay, but I just didn't give a crap about any of the characters. **Characters (2/5)**: The characters in this movie were so bland they were almost derivative. They were also completely unlikeable. In most bad movies, you can at least root for the characters, even if you know they're probably going to die at some point. But even the main character you can get behind and hope nothing happens to them. In this movie, if everyone died, I figured the world would be better off. Even at the end, when the main character was saved, I just didn't care. **Directing (1/5)**: I wish I could say the director at least tried, except he tried to copy other directors who did this type of movie better and didn't seem to put any real effort into his job. It's almost as if he read the script and didn't add any flare to it. His directing was dry, overly dramatic, and too serious for a movie like this. I don't mind movies being dramatic, but seriously, this is a movie about dinosaurs being harvested for their organs. Have a little fun with it. **Casting (2/5)**: Most of the time with Asylum movies, the casting may not be great, but the actors are at least likeable. None of the actors in this movie were likeable, and it wasn't just the roles they were playing (see below). **Acting (3/5)**: The actors took their roles entirely too seriously, and I have to assume the director was responsible. I assume when being cast, he said something along the lines of "This is going to be a movie to rival Jurassic Park. I want you to put everything you have into your roles." Then he starts swinging a watch before their eyes in a hypnotizing manner. "This is not a straight-to-video movie. This is an Oscar-winning movie. You need to give an Oscar-winning performance. When you wake up, you will take this movie seriously!" *Snap* Unfortunately, the actors made you not care about their characters. **Music (3/5)**: The music fit the movie pretty well: It was dry, dull, and did nothing to make this movie exciting. It fit into the background very well and was utterly and completely forgettable. 3 out of 5 might be too generous, but at least the music wasn't horrendous. **Cinematography (3/5)**: For the most part, the cinematography was pretty good in this movie. The dinosaurs didn't look like crap, but I've seen better dinosaurs on YouTube. Camera work all around was solid, so not real complaints here. **Production Design (3/5)**: The corporate laboratory setting wasn't bad, but it did look like a cheap set in many places. And the layout was sometimes confusing. Costumes looked okay and nothing seemed out of place. **Pacing (3/5)**: For a short movie, the pacing was very slow. There were points were I kept checking the time to see how much time was left and sorely disappointed by how much time was left. **Enjoyment (1/5)**: I did not like this movie. I did not like the plot, I did not like the characters—-I did not like anything about it. For an Asylum movie, this was one of the worst I've seen. I recommend avoiding it unless you just want to torture yourself. Go watch *Jurassic Prey* instead--it's bad, but at least it knows it's bad.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









