U2: Rattle and Hum
Performance & Direction: U2: Rattle and Hum Review
Last updated: January 29, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is U2: Rattle and Hum (1988) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Music.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Music is often anchored by its ensemble, and U2: Rattle and Hum features a noteworthy lineup led by Bono . Supported by the likes of The Edge and Larry Mullen Jr. , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: U2: Rattle and Hum
Quick Plot Summary: U2: Rattle and Hum is a Music, Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: U2: Rattle and Hum
Ending Breakdown: U2: Rattle and Hum resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to music resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the music themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of U2: Rattle and Hum reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch U2: Rattle and Hum?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Music films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Box Office Collection: U2: Rattle and Hum
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $8.6M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
Top Cast: U2: Rattle and Hum
All Cast & Crew →
U2: Rattle and Hum Parents Guide & Age Rating
1988 AdvisoryWondering about U2: Rattle and Hum age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of U2: Rattle and Hum is 98 minutes (1h 38m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.2/10, and global performance metrics, U2: Rattle and Hum is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1988 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is U2: Rattle and Hum worth watching?
U2: Rattle and Hum is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Music movies. It has a verified rating of 7.2/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find U2: Rattle and Hum parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for U2: Rattle and Hum identifies it as PG-13. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of U2: Rattle and Hum?
The total duration of U2: Rattle and Hum is 98 minutes, which is approximately 1h 38m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked U2: Rattle and Hum
How U2: Rattle and Hum Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for U2: Rattle and Hum
Its not at all bad. The homage that U2 is playing seemingly went over a lot of peoples heads causing the illusion that they were comparing themselves to rock and blues greats when, really, they were thanking them. I think the real dividing line here, however, is Bono. You either love him and almost venerate him as a saint among rock stars, or you hate him for the exact same reason, that is, you hate him for caring. And that is why I believe so many people walked away from this documentary. Then again, honestly, it could be because of U2's later day sins. The Joshua Tree was their main break out and a lot of fans will the the "they were good up until they got famous" line. That's not exactly true, with the exception of the argument over Zooropa, they were good through Pop. The fall back, especially following All You Can't Leave Behind and the lackluster follow-ups that tainted the formerly great band are probably the reason this is viewed with hostility. Give it a short, if nothing else than the film is a love letter to American music and general, and the rock and blues idols that inspired one of the best bands of the 80s
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Useful Links
More with Bono
