Is Videodrome Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Videodrome is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Videodrome is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.3/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Horror, Science Fiction, Mystery genre.
Answer: Yes, Videodrome is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1983, Videodrome emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Science Fiction, Mystery domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of As the president of a trashy TV channel, Max Renn is desperate for new programming to attract viewers. Unlike standard genre fare, Videodrome attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Videodrome features a noteworthy lineup led by James Woods . Supported by the likes of Debbie Harry and Sonja Smits , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Videodrome (1983) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.3/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Videodrome is a Horror, Science Fiction, Mystery film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The horror unfolds through carefully crafted atmosphere and escalating dread. As the president of a trashy TV channel, Max Renn is desperate for new programming to attract viewers. When he happens upon "Videodrome," a TV show dedicated to gratuitous torture and punishment, Max sees a potential hit and broadcasts the show on his channel. However, after his girlfriend auditions for the show and never returns, Max investigates the truth behind Videodrome and discovers that the graphic violence may not be as fake as he thought. The film uses both psychological terror and visceral scares, building tension through what's unseen as much as what's shown. The pacing allows for breathing room between scares, making each frightening moment more effective.
Beneath the scares lies commentary on deeper fears—loss of control, the unknown, or societal anxieties manifested as literal monsters.
Ending Breakdown: Videodrome resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Videodrome reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $6.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $2.1M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Videodrome is $6.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.3/10, and global collection metrics, Videodrome stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1983 cinematic year.
Videodrome is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.3/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Horror, Science Fiction, Mystery movies.
Yes, Videodrome is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Horror, Science Fiction, Mystery cinema.
Videodrome may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
"Max" (James Woods) runs a television channel that specialises in adult content. Always on the look out for new and more innovative and shocking content, he stumbles upon a brief series of satellite images that tantalise him. It's on a television talk show that he meets "Nicki" (Debbie Harry) who has a penchant for sex with a twist - and that not only turns them both on, but furthers his desire to obtain his newly found (and pretty violent) content for his Channel 83 output. The other guest on that show is the renowned "Prof. Oblivion" (Jack Creley) who prognosticates that one day the reality of television and video will replace the "real" reality. These threads slowly all tie together when "Nicki" decides that she is going to star in this new "Videodrome" enterprise and "Renn" must now reconcile his concern for her safety with his mounting need to acquire the show. This film is surreal and bizarre and yet it's still quite effective at illustrating the most visceral aspects of human nature - sex, venality, lust - even pain; and the visual effects (particularly towards the last fifteen minutes) must have been particularly effective. It's a bit on the sordid side - not that that's necessarily a bad thing, but at times the seaminess of it all is distracting from the more interesting and provocative aspects of the narrative. Time hasn't been very kind to it either, the effects have lost much of their potency now and the acting is mediocre at best. It is well worth a watch, but I'm not sure that will be the case for very much longer.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.