Is Without a Stitch Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Without a Stitch is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Without a Stitch is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Without a Stitch is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1968, Without a Stitch emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of When a high-school girl complains of her inability to reach sexual climax, her doctor suggests that she keep a diary of her sexual encounters. Unlike standard genre fare, Without a Stitch attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Without a Stitch features a noteworthy lineup led by Anne Grete Nissen . Supported by the likes of Ib Mossin and Søren Strømberg , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Without a Stitch (1968) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Without a Stitch is a Comedy, Drama film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Without a Stitch attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Without a Stitch reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:






CultpixAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.9/10, and global collection metrics, Without a Stitch stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1968 cinematic year.
Without a Stitch is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.9/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.9/10, Without a Stitch may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Without a Stitch is currently available for streaming on Cultpix. You can also check for it on platforms like Cultpix depending on your region.
A young Scandinavian woman (Ana-Grete Nissen) is concerned that she is frigid, so she consults a young male doctor who prescribes a highly unorthodox and unprofessional(but pretty predictable) solution to her problem. After his "hands-on" approach brings her some definite sexual satisfaction, he recommends that she continue her "explorations" by taking a long road trip where, naturally, she is to have sex with all, um, comers that she meets along the way. This leads to straight sex scenes, lesbian sex scenes, three-way sex scenes, and at least one hilarious S-and-M sex scene. These sex scenes are ridiculously numerous, but they are also quite fast-paced, making this movie a little more exciting than most tedious softcore grinders. Like a lot of 70's Swedish actresses, Nissen is quite appealing simply because she looks like a normal girl rather than the well-worn Times Square skanks you tend to find in a lot of American softcore films of that era (and she's obviously more girl than silicone, unlike pretty much all the "adult" actresses of today).
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.