Is Without Warning Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Without Warning is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 97 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Without Warning is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Without Warning is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 97 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1980, Without Warning emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Sandy and Greg are teenagers who go camping, despite warnings not to, with their friends. Unlike standard genre fare, Without Warning attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Without Warning features a noteworthy lineup led by Tarah Nutter . Supported by the likes of Christopher S. Nelson and Jack Palance , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Without Warning (1980) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Without Warning is a Horror, Science Fiction film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Without Warning attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Without Warning reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $150.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Without Warning is $150.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.2/10, and global collection metrics, Without Warning stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1980 cinematic year.
Without Warning has received mixed reviews with a 5.2/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Without Warning is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror, Science Fiction movies, but read reviews first.
Without Warning may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
**_Rural Southern California horror with Jack Palance and Martin Landau_** Two teen couples in SoCal go out to a remote lake for some summer fun, but experience something horrific. The only people who believe their story are two local old men that aren’t quite right in the head (Jack Palance and Martin Landau). Christopher S. Nelson and Tarah Nutter play the two protagonists. "Without Warning" (1980) is an obscure horror flick that obviously influenced “Predator” (1987). Although “Predator” is technically the better film, I prefer this more modest production. It works up some quality spookiness along with an air of paranoia. As far as its f/x concepts go, it borrows from Star Trek’s “Operation - Annihilate” (1967) and “The Corbomite Maneuver” (1966), mixing in the geographical setting of “Tourist Trap” (1979) with elements of “Squirm” (1976). The inclusion of Palance and Landau as crazies also brings to mind the soon-to-come “Alone in the Dark” (1982). Whilst Tarah Nutter (Sandy) does well as the lead female, Lynn Theel (Beth) is notable in the feminine department. Christopher S. Nelson plays a likable male protagonist and should have gone on to better things, but he was never able to breakout in the biz beyond TV work and minor movies. My rating is kinda high for such a Grade ‘B’ horror that’s about 12-15 minutes too long, yet it delivers the goods by featuring the requisite staples in a respectable manner, including a moving piano-oriented score. The film runs 1 hour, 29 minutes, and was shot at Paramount Ranch, Agoura, California (main location), and nearby Agoura Valley Inn (bar scene), as well as Malibu Creek State Park (lake). GRADE: B-/B
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.