Performance & Direction: Working with a Master: Mick Garris Review
Last updated: January 25, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Working with a Master: Mick Garris (2006) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 2.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Documentary.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Working with a Master: Mick Garris features a noteworthy lineup led by Ron Perlman . Supported by the likes of Matt Frewer and Steven Weber , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Working with a Master: Mick Garris (2006) is negative. With an audience rating of 2.0/10, it stands as a challenging project that may struggle to find an audience.
Story & Plot Summary: Working with a Master: Mick Garris
Quick Plot Summary: Working with a Master: Mick Garris is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Working with a Master: Mick Garris
Ending Breakdown: Working with a Master: Mick Garris attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the documentary themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Working with a Master: Mick Garris reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Working with a Master: Mick Garris?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Documentary films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Working with a Master: Mick Garris
All Cast & Crew →
Working with a Master: Mick Garris Parents Guide & Age Rating
2006 AdvisoryWondering about Working with a Master: Mick Garris age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Working with a Master: Mick Garris is 19 minutes (19m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 2.0/10, and global performance metrics, Working with a Master: Mick Garris is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 2006 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Working with a Master: Mick Garris worth watching?
Working with a Master: Mick Garris is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies. It has a verified rating of 2/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Working with a Master: Mick Garris parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Working with a Master: Mick Garris identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Working with a Master: Mick Garris?
The total duration of Working with a Master: Mick Garris is 19 minutes, which is approximately 0h 19m long.
How Working with a Master: Mick Garris Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Working with a Master: Mick Garris
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
