Is Zero Days Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Zero Days is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 116 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Zero Days is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.3/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Yes, Zero Days is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 116 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2016, Zero Days emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Alex Gibney explores the phenomenon of Stuxnet, a self-replicating computer virus discovered in 2010 by international IT experts. Unlike standard genre fare, Zero Days attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Zero Days features a noteworthy lineup led by Yossi Melman . Supported by the likes of Ralph Langner and Emad Kiyaei , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Zero Days (2016) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.3/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Zero Days is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Zero Days resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Zero Days reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $109.6K |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |





Amazon Prime Video
Philo
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
FlixFling
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
FlixFlingAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.3/10, and global collection metrics, Zero Days stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.
Zero Days is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.3/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Documentary movies.
Yes, Zero Days is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Documentary cinema.
Zero Days is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Philo, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
Stuxnet was malware that flashed around the world via Microsoft computers, triggering arbitrary BSODs and random reboots. In 2010 cybersecurity firms captured and began analyzing the worm. Stuxnet (name derived from merging two random lines in the code) had digital certificates. Digital certificates require biometrics (human identification) and pass codes. But Stuxnet could attain access without that. It ominously coded multiple zero days exploit. Symantec's investigators see maybe one a year, looking at thousands of lines of code. Stuxnet had four. As we learn in the documentary, it also had undoubtedly stolen product identity codes for PLCs (programmable logic controls) from Siemens. Where were these PLCs? Installed on centrifuges at Natanz, an Iranian nuclear site. And the game's afoot. Whose program? To what purpose? Gibney does an excellent job of gearing us up for the technowizardry with hunter/seekers Eric Chien and Liam O'Munchu (Symantec) as geek guides to the nation-state business of cyber espionage and, as General Michael Hayden, former CIA and NSA director calls it, the "hideously classified" world of cyber weaponry. We meet the journalists, bench players and sideline government officialdom who were not a part of, or even aware of, Stuxnet. The documentary is a mild, entertaining but serious call to start a dialogue about cyber weapons and deployment of same. How do countries begin to arbitrate treaties regarding use of life-threatening coding? Filmed well, the effects shrouding the unnamed informant are great viewing. The on-camera personnel are well-chosen, entertaining and as informative as they're able to be. There are enough tech buzzwords to keep nontechs like me interested, and enough about how dangerous coding with a mission to DISRUPT DEGRADE DESTROY can be for those of us who count on critical infrastructure systems.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.