RATING★ 10.0
WORTH IT? YES
A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: YES
Editorial Verified

Is A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1943)

Marcel Ichac accompanied the mountaineer Armand Charlet, in 1943, in the repetition of the first crossing of the Aiguilles du Diable that the guide of the Chamonix valley had made in 1925. A roped party joined on snow and ice the Col du Géant, reached at the Mont-Blanc-du-Tacul stop and on the Col du Diable. The men cross the needles by climbing chimneys, cracks and abseiling walls. They access the eastern slope of the Mont-Blanc massif which offers a panorama of the Grandes Jorasses and Mont-Blanc. Armand Charlet was the first to reach the summits of four needles above 4000 meters: the Devil's Horn, Pointe Chaubert, Pointe Médiane and Pointe Carmen; he also tells how he successfully climbed the furthest, the Isolated. Marcel Ichac shot these scenes as close as possible to his subject, he responded with this film with a “truth” cinema, the principle of which we find in his later productions.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

YES, ABSOLUTELY

If you are a fan of Documentary, Adventure cinema, then A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1943 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Documentary films
Fans of Adventure films
Viewers seeking quality storytelling

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable, a standout production of 1943, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Documentary, Adventure landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Marcel Ichac accompanied the mountaineer Armand Charlet, in 1943, in the repetition of the first crossing of the Aiguilles du Diable that the guide of the Chamonix valley had made in 1925. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Documentary, Adventure are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Marcel Ichac accompanied the mountaineer Armand Charlet, in 1943, in the repetition of the first crossing of the Aiguilles du Diable that the guide of the Chamonix valley had made in 1925. A roped party joined on snow and ice the Col du Géant, reached at the Mont-Blanc-du-Tacul stop and on the Col du Diable. The men cross the needles by climbing chimneys, cracks and abseiling walls. They access the eastern slope of the Mont-Blanc massif which offers a panorama of the Grandes Jorasses and Mont-Blanc. Armand Charlet was the first to reach the summits of four needles above 4000 meters: the Devil's Horn, Pointe Chaubert, Pointe Médiane and Pointe Carmen; he also tells how he successfully climbed the furthest, the Isolated. Marcel Ichac shot these scenes as close as possible to his subject, he responded with this film with a “truth” cinema, the principle of which we find in his later productions."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The performance by Armand Charlet is nothing short of transformative, providing an emotional anchor that tethers the film's more abstract concepts to a relatable human experience. Armand Charlet captures the nuance of the script with a performance that will likely define their career for years to come.

The direction by Marcel Ichac is marked by a bold and uncompromising hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 20 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Documentary, Adventure, then this is a mandatory viewing experience, a film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.

The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 10/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1943 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Marcel Ichac respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Armand Charlet or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, A l'Assaut Des Aiguilles Du Diable is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: EXCEPTIONAL - A MUST-WATCH

⏳ Time Investment

20MIN

At approximately 0.3 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement