RATING★ TBA
WORTH IT? NO
A Little Sex In The Night backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for A Little Sex In The Night.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is A Little Sex In The Night Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1977)

Charlie Schreiner plays the nephew of Richard and Liliane Lemieuvre. He is very inexperienced sexually and arrives to find the maid, Fabrette, lying on the kitchen floor covered with uncooked spaghetti and masturbating. He is too keen on studying to be interested in women but Martine eventually manages to arouse him. And when she does it won't go down. A doctor is called (Christine Chireix) who gives him 'suction' but he's still erect. Meanwhile, Veronique and Bernard Hug have sneaked into the house for no apparent reason and have a threesome with Martine. Martine and Veronique both have their way with Charlie who is still erect. The Lemievres are about to divorce and Liliane is frustrated as Richard is not interested in sex. Richard picks up Marilyn, a hitchhiker (Francoise Avril), and she tries Charlie and Richard at the same time. Charlie then has a foursome with Martine, Veronique, and the doctor. Liliane relieves her frustrations with Bernard and finally, there is a free for all.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of cinema, then A Little Sex In The Night offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1977 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1977, A Little Sex In The Night represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Modern Cinema category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Charlie Schreiner plays the nephew of Richard and Liliane Lemieuvre. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Charlie Schreiner plays the nephew of Richard and Liliane Lemieuvre. He is very inexperienced sexually and arrives to find the maid, Fabrette, lying on the kitchen floor covered with uncooked spaghetti and masturbating. He is too keen on studying to be interested in women but Martine eventually manages to arouse him. And when she does it won't go down. A doctor is called (Christine Chireix) who gives him 'suction' but he's still erect. Meanwhile, Veronique and Bernard Hug have sneaked into the house for no apparent reason and have a threesome with Martine. Martine and Veronique both have their way with Charlie who is still erect. The Lemievres are about to divorce and Liliane is frustrated as Richard is not interested in sex. Richard picks up Marilyn, a hitchhiker (Francoise Avril), and she tries Charlie and Richard at the same time. Charlie then has a foursome with Martine, Veronique, and the doctor. Liliane relieves her frustrations with Bernard and finally, there is a free for all."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The presence of Marie-Christine Chireix provides a necessary level of professionalism to the production, even when the underlying script struggles to maintain a consistent tone. It is a testament to their skill that they remain the most engaging element of the film.

The direction by Michel Caputo is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 86 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is A Little Sex In The Night truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, A Little Sex In The Night explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1977 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Michel Caputo respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, A Little Sex In The Night is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Marie-Christine Chireix or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, A Little Sex In The Night is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

86MIN

At approximately 1.4 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement