RATING★ 5.5
WORTH IT? MAYBE
A Matter Of Size backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for A Matter Of Size.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is A Matter Of Size Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1983)

Bill Henson and Eric Stryker share wet dreams and experiences on the beach.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of cinema, then A Matter Of Size offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1983 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

In the evolving tapestry of Modern Cinema cinema, the 1983 release of A Matter Of Size stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Bill Henson and Eric Stryker share wet dreams and experiences on the beach. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Bill Henson and Eric Stryker share wet dreams and experiences on the beach."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The ensemble, led by Bill Henson, delivers a professional and engaging performance that satisfies the requirements of the Modern Cinema genre. While it may not reinvent the wheel, the commitment to the material is evident in every frame.

The direction by Matt Sterling is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 68 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is A Matter Of Size truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 5.5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, A Matter Of Size explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1983 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Matt Sterling respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, A Matter Of Size serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Bill Henson or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, A Matter Of Size is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

68MIN

At approximately 1.1 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement