RATING★ 6.3
WORTH IT? MAYBE
An Angel for Satan backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for An Angel for Satan.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is An Angel for Satan Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1966)

At the end of the 19th century, in a little Italian village by a lake an old statue is recovered. Soon a series of crimes start and the superstitious people of the village believe that the statue carries an ancient malediction.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Horror cinema, then An Angel for Satan offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1966 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Horror films

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1966, An Angel for Satan represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Horror category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into At the end of the 19th century, in a little Italian village by a lake an old statue is recovered. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Horror are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "At the end of the 19th century, in a little Italian village by a lake an old statue is recovered. Soon a series of crimes start and the superstitious people of the village believe that the statue carries an ancient malediction."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The ensemble, led by Barbara Steele, delivers a professional and engaging performance that satisfies the requirements of the Horror genre. While it may not reinvent the wheel, the commitment to the material is evident in every frame.

The direction by Camillo Mastrocinque is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 90 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is An Angel for Satan truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Horror, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6.3/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, An Angel for Satan explores the dichotomy of fear and discovery. The 1966 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Camillo Mastrocinque respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, An Angel for Satan serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Barbara Steele or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, An Angel for Satan is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: RECOMMENDED - QUALITY CINEMA

⏳ Time Investment

90MIN

At approximately 1.5 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement