Profit & Loss Analysis

Is Asshole Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2002)
In the fall of 2001 just a month and a half after the 9/11 attack on New York, David Kramer's studio suffers a devastating gas explosion. Kramer tries to find the significance of t...
β¨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Documentary, Family cinema, then Asshole offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 2002 landscape.
π₯ Target Audience
π Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
In the evolving tapestry of Documentary, Family cinema, the 2002 release of Asshole stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into In the fall of 2001 just a month and a half after the 9/11 attack on New York, David Kramer's studio suffers a devastating gas explosion. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Documentary, Family are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "In the fall of 2001 just a month and a half after the 9/11 attack on New York, David Kramer's studio suffers a devastating gas explosion. Kramer tries to find the significance of these two national tragedies."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Anchoring the narrative with a presence that is both commanding and subtle, David Kramer delivers a turn that is both technically flawless and emotionally resonant. This is Documentary acting at its most potent.
The direction by David Kramer is marked by a bold and uncompromising hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 7 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Asshole truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Documentary, Family, then this is a mandatory viewing experienceβa film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.
The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 10/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Asshole explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2002 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and David Kramer respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Asshole is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of David Kramer or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Asshole is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
β³ Time Investment
At approximately 0.1 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.