RATINGโ˜… 3.3
WORTH IT? NO
Because Why backdrop
๐Ÿ†

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Because Why.

View Review โ†’
โ˜… WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Because Why Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1993)

After five years of travelling abroad, Alex arrives back in Montreal. All he has with him are a back-pack and a slip of paper with an ex-girlfriend's address scrawled on it....

Advertisement

โœจ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of Comedy, Romance cinema, then Because Why offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1993 landscape.

Advertisement

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Target Audience

โœ“ Fans of Comedy films
โœ“ Fans of Romance films
โœ“ casual viewers seeking light entertainment

๐Ÿ“” Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Because Why, a standout production of 1993, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Comedy, Romance landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into After five years of travelling abroad, Alex arrives back in Montreal. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Comedy, Romance are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "After five years of travelling abroad, Alex arrives back in Montreal. All he has with him are a back-pack and a slip of paper with an ex-girlfriend's address scrawled on it."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Michael Riley does an admirable job with the material provided, but one can't help but feel that a more daring directorial approach would have yielded a more impactful result. It is a competent but ultimately standard genre performance.

The direction by Arto Paragamian is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 104 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Because Why truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Comedy, Romance, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 3.3/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Because Why explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1993 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Arto Paragamian respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Because Why is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Michael Riley or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Because Why is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

โณ Time Investment

104MIN

At approximately 1.7 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement