Profit & Loss Analysis

Is Big Guns Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1987)
Chad Douglas gives Kevin Wiles the kind of sensual fucking that most female porn stars would envy. It was the Adam Film World Gay Movie of the Year for 1988! A true classic that no...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of cinema, then Big Guns offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1987 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Debuting in 1987, Big Guns represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Modern Cinema category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Chad Douglas gives Kevin Wiles the kind of sensual fucking that most female porn stars would envy. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Chad Douglas gives Kevin Wiles the kind of sensual fucking that most female porn stars would envy. It was the Adam Film World Gay Movie of the Year for 1988! A true classic that no film collection should be without. One of William Higgins' most popular titles, Big Guns literally brings out all of the BIG players in Higgins' stable of boys! This digitally remastered 20th Anniversary Edition contains the final 3-way scene with Rocky Armano that was not included in the original VHS version!"
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The performance by Mike Henson is nothing short of transformative, providing an emotional anchor that tethers the film's more abstract concepts to a relatable human experience. Mike Henson captures the nuance of the script with a performance that will likely define their career for years to come.
The direction by William Higgins is marked by a bold and uncompromising hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 104 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Big Guns truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a mandatory viewing experience, a film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.
The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 8/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Big Guns explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1987 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and William Higgins respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Big Guns is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Mike Henson or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Big Guns is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.7 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.