Profit & Loss Analysis

Is Blood Type: Blue Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1978)
UFOs appear on Earth, and people who actually see them suddenly find that their blood has turned blue. Soon panic and hysteria result in the new "blue-bloods" being persecuted by t...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Science Fiction, Thriller, Drama cinema, then Blood Type: Blue offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1978 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Debuting in 1978, Blood Type: Blue represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Science Fiction, Thriller, Drama category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into UFOs appear on Earth, and people who actually see them suddenly find that their blood has turned blue. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Science Fiction, Thriller, Drama are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "UFOs appear on Earth, and people who actually see them suddenly find that their blood has turned blue. Soon panic and hysteria result in the new "blue-bloods" being persecuted by the rest of mankind, and eventually certain all-too-familiar measures begin to be taken against them."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. In Blood Type: Blue, we see Hiroshi Katsuno utilizing their established screen presence to carry the story forward. It is a solid, workmanlike performance that serves the director's vision without overshadowing the larger narrative goals.
The direction by Kihachi Okamoto is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 133 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Blood Type: Blue truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Science Fiction, Thriller, Drama, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 5.5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Blood Type: Blue explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1978 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Kihachi Okamoto respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Blood Type: Blue serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Hiroshi Katsuno or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Blood Type: Blue is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 2.2 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.