RATING★ 8.4
WORTH IT? YES
Building the Gherkin backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Building the Gherkin.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: YES
Editorial Verified

Is Building the Gherkin Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2005)

Can a single building impact the career of an architect, the image of a global company and even the skyline of a big city? Just a month and a day after the disastrous attack on the World Trade Center in New York, the first steel beam of a new tower is erected in London. One question is on everybody’s mind: is it the right decision to build a new iconic tower in the midst of London’s financial district, on a site that has already been bombed before? The 40-storey steel and glass tower sparks further controversy. Norman Foster, one of Britain’s most visionary architects, calls his design for the new Swiss Re London headquarters ‘radial – socially, technically, architecturally and spatially’. In fact, its size and shape are so radical that it is almost immediately nicknamed ‘the erotic gherkin’. Will the Gherkin become the landmark they all dream of?

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

YES, ABSOLUTELY

If you are a fan of Documentary cinema, then Building the Gherkin offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 2005 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Documentary films
Viewers seeking quality storytelling

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 2005, Building the Gherkin represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Documentary category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Can a single building impact the career of an architect, the image of a global company and even the skyline of a big city? Just a month and a day after the disastrous attack on the World Trade Center in New York, the first steel beam of a new tower is erected in London. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Documentary are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Can a single building impact the career of an architect, the image of a global company and even the skyline of a big city? Just a month and a day after the disastrous attack on the World Trade Center in New York, the first steel beam of a new tower is erected in London. One question is on everybody’s mind: is it the right decision to build a new iconic tower in the midst of London’s financial district, on a site that has already been bombed before? The 40-storey steel and glass tower sparks further controversy. Norman Foster, one of Britain’s most visionary architects, calls his design for the new Swiss Re London headquarters ‘radial – socially, technically, architecturally and spatially’. In fact, its size and shape are so radical that it is almost immediately nicknamed ‘the erotic gherkin’. Will the Gherkin become the landmark they all dream of?"

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The performance by Norman Foster is nothing short of transformative, providing an emotional anchor that tethers the film's more abstract concepts to a relatable human experience. Norman Foster captures the nuance of the script with a performance that will likely define their career for years to come.

The direction by Mirjam von Arx is marked by a bold and uncompromising hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 89 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Building the Gherkin truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Documentary, then this is a mandatory viewing experience, a film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.

The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 8.4/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Building the Gherkin explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2005 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Mirjam von Arx respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Building the Gherkin is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Norman Foster or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Building the Gherkin is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: EXCEPTIONAL - A MUST-WATCH

⏳ Time Investment

89MIN

At approximately 1.5 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement