RATING★ TBA
WORTH IT? NO
Color Blind backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Color Blind.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Color Blind Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2006)

When do you draw the line? Ty Hudson, a corrupt landowner, takes guys off the street and puts them to work on the ranch that he and his son Riley Scott own. His idea of work is to use and abuse these hot ethnic studs. His son sees things differently, which causes conflict between he and dear old dad. Luca DiCorso is delivering a package to the owner of the house. Sexy stud Kamrun answers the door plays a trick on Luca, making him think that he is the owner. The two men are so hot for each other that they get it on right on the front porch. Big black cock up a hairy tight hole, and just for fun, Luca takes a stab at Kamrun’s hot bubble ass. Riley is tipped off to dad’s dastardly deeds and catches him in the act of being double teamed by horse hung stallions Tiger and Jake Samms in the stables. After putting dad in his place, Riley gets to be with the one that he really loves – hunky Brock Webster. Their lust for each other explodes as the explore each other’s sweaty bodies.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of cinema, then Color Blind offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2006 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

In the evolving tapestry of Modern Cinema cinema, the 2006 release of Color Blind stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into When do you draw the line? Ty Hudson, a corrupt landowner, takes guys off the street and puts them to work on the ranch that he and his son Riley Scott own. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "When do you draw the line? Ty Hudson, a corrupt landowner, takes guys off the street and puts them to work on the ranch that he and his son Riley Scott own. His idea of work is to use and abuse these hot ethnic studs. His son sees things differently, which causes conflict between he and dear old dad. Luca DiCorso is delivering a package to the owner of the house. Sexy stud Kamrun answers the door plays a trick on Luca, making him think that he is the owner. The two men are so hot for each other that they get it on right on the front porch. Big black cock up a hairy tight hole, and just for fun, Luca takes a stab at Kamrun’s hot bubble ass. Riley is tipped off to dad’s dastardly deeds and catches him in the act of being double teamed by horse hung stallions Tiger and Jake Samms in the stables. After putting dad in his place, Riley gets to be with the one that he really loves – hunky Brock Webster. Their lust for each other explodes as the explore each other’s sweaty bodies."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Despite the inherent talent of Brian Bodine, the performance in Color Blind feels somewhat constrained by a narrative framework that doesn't fully exploit their range. There are flashes of brilliance, but the overall impact is muted.

The direction by Doug Jeffries is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 120 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Color Blind truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Color Blind explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2006 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Doug Jeffries respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Color Blind is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Brian Bodine or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Color Blind is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

120MIN

At approximately 2.0 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement