Profit & Loss Analysis

Is David Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1997)
A distinguished military leader whose reign was touched by great scandal, shocking betrayals and rousing victories. A simple shepherd boy chosen to be king, under the watchful eyes...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Adventure, Drama, TV Movie cinema, then David offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1997 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Debuting in 1997, David represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Adventure, Drama, TV Movie category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A distinguished military leader whose reign was touched by great scandal, shocking betrayals and rousing victories. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Adventure, Drama, TV Movie are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A distinguished military leader whose reign was touched by great scandal, shocking betrayals and rousing victories. A simple shepherd boy chosen to be king, under the watchful eyes of prophet Samuel."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The ensemble, led by Nathaniel Parker, delivers a professional and engaging performance that satisfies the requirements of the Adventure, Drama, TV Movie genre. While it may not reinvent the wheel, the commitment to the material is evident in every frame.
The direction by Robert Markowitz is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 173 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is David truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Adventure, Drama, TV Movie, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6.5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, David explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1997 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Robert Markowitz respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, David serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Nathaniel Parker or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, David is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 2.9 hours, the film requires a significant time commitment.