Is David and Goliath Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1986)
Derek, Margo, and Moki jump through time yet again and find themselves lost. As they search for information, they are threatened by wild animals. A young shepherd arrives on the scene and rescues them. They learn that this shepherd just happens to be the future King David. They follow David to Jerusalem, where they watch as he tries to help mend Saul's ill temper. Finally, they witness the defeat of Goliath.
โจ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Family, Animation cinema, then David and Goliath offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1986 landscape.
๐ฅ Target Audience
๐ Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
In the evolving tapestry of Family, Animation cinema, the 1986 release of David and Goliath stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Derek, Margo, and Moki jump through time yet again and find themselves lost. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Family, Animation are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Derek, Margo, and Moki jump through time yet again and find themselves lost. As they search for information, they are threatened by wild animals. A young shepherd arrives on the scene and rescues them. They learn that this shepherd just happens to be the future King David. They follow David to Jerusalem, where they watch as he tries to help mend Saul's ill temper. Finally, they witness the defeat of Goliath."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Anchoring the narrative with a presence that is both commanding and subtle, Rob Paulsen delivers a turn that is both technically flawless and emotionally resonant. This is Family acting at its most potent.
The direction by Ray Patterson is marked by a bold and uncompromising hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 26 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is David and Goliath truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Family, Animation, then this is a mandatory viewing experience, a film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.
The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 8.6/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, David and Goliath explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1986 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Ray Patterson respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, David and Goliath is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Rob Paulsen or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, David and Goliath is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
โณ Time Investment
At approximately 0.4 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.