Is Death by Shooting Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1987)

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Death by Shooting, a standout production of 1987, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Action landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into In February 1965, Seyed Ali Andarzgou along with several others waited in front of the parliament building to assassinate Hasan Ali Mansour. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Action are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "In February 1965, Seyed Ali Andarzgou along with several others waited in front of the parliament building to assassinate Hasan Ali Mansour. The assassination is carried out successfully, but the officers arrest and execute all the perpetrators of the assassination except Seyed Ali Andarzgou after a lot of investigation. SAVAK agents are looking for Andarzgou because they consider him to be one of the main designers of the assassination, but Seyed Ali Andarzgou continues to fight in disguise and reaches the border of arrest several times, but he is saved and every time he is forced to go with The family moves to another city or village. For the last time, SAVAK agents besieged his place of residence and Seyed Ali Andarzgou was martyred after a severe armed conflict."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Majid Majidi does an admirable job with the material provided, but one can't help but feel that a more daring directorial approach would have yielded a more impactful result. It is a competent but ultimately standard genre performance.

The direction by Ali Asghar Shadravan is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 90 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Death by Shooting truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Action, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Death by Shooting explores the dichotomy of strength and vulnerability. The 1987 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Ali Asghar Shadravan respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Death by Shooting is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Majid Majidi or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Death by Shooting is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.