Is Dr. Good Glove Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1995)

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1995, Dr. Good Glove represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Modern Cinema category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Plain Wrapped Video gives you its most twisted production yet, Dr. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Modern Cinema are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Plain Wrapped Video gives you its most twisted production yet, Dr. Good Glove. Watch in awe and envy as Dr. Good Glove (man of everybody's dreams, the incomparable Cory Jay) and his lean, mean assistant (John Payne as Nurse Philthy) work their way through a waiting room full of desperate, neglected holes (including the legendary Bryce Colby). To accommodate these hungry hordes, the Good Doctor also has on hand a staff of trained obedient technicians who mercilessly carry out all procedures - and an office outfitted with state-of-the-art anal expansion equipment including the much talked about, one-of-kind Dildo Machine -- smoking, thrusting, metallic gizmo that gives the term "auto-erotica" a whole new meaning."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Despite the inherent talent of Jeff Baron, the performance in Dr. Good Glove feels somewhat constrained by a narrative framework that doesn't fully exploit their range. There are flashes of brilliance, but the overall impact is muted.

The direction by Steven Scarborough is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 58 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Dr. Good Glove truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Modern Cinema, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Dr. Good Glove explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1995 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Steven Scarborough respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Dr. Good Glove is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Jeff Baron or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Dr. Good Glove is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.