RATING★ 6.0
WORTH IT? MAYBE
En passant backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for En passant.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is En passant Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2015)

Andor is a young chess player, who even calls his pet turtle Kasparov. “Do you think I will succeed? - the boy asks her before the decisive tournament. "If I win, he will never come back." Who is Andor talking about and why is he either afraid of this return, or wants it?

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Drama cinema, then En passant offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2015 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Drama films

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

In the evolving tapestry of Drama cinema, the 2015 release of En passant stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Andor is a young chess player, who even calls his pet turtle Kasparov. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Drama are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Andor is a young chess player, who even calls his pet turtle Kasparov. “Do you think I will succeed? - the boy asks her before the decisive tournament. "If I win, he will never come back." Who is Andor talking about and why is he either afraid of this return, or wants it?"

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. While the script occasionally leans into familiar territory, the efforts of Dorka Gryllus ensure that the emotional beats of En passant always land with sufficient weight. Dorka Gryllus provides a steady, reliable performance that anchors the film through its narrative shifts.

The direction by Kata Oláh is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 19 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is En passant truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Drama, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, En passant explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2015 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Kata Oláh respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, En passant serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Dorka Gryllus or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, En passant is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: RECOMMENDED - QUALITY CINEMA

⏳ Time Investment

19MIN

At approximately 0.3 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement