
Is Far from Vietnam Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1967)
In seven different parts, Godard, Ivens, Klein, Lelouch, Marker, Resnais, and Varda show their sympathy for the North-Vietnamese army during the Vietnam War.
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Documentary, War, Drama cinema, then Far from Vietnam offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1967 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Debuting in 1967, Far from Vietnam represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Documentary, War, Drama category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into In seven different parts, Godard, Ivens, Klein, Lelouch, Marker, Resnais, and Varda show their sympathy for the North-Vietnamese army during the Vietnam War. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Documentary, War, Drama are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "In seven different parts, Godard, Ivens, Klein, Lelouch, Marker, Resnais, and Varda show their sympathy for the North-Vietnamese army during the Vietnam War."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Anchoring the narrative with a presence that is both commanding and subtle, Maurice Garrel delivers a turn that is both technically flawless and emotionally resonant. This is Documentary acting at its most potent.
The direction by Jean-Luc Godard is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 116 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Far from Vietnam truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Documentary, War, Drama, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 7/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Far from Vietnam explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1967 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Jean-Luc Godard respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Far from Vietnam serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Maurice Garrel or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Far from Vietnam is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.9 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.