Is Finger Licken Good Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1976)

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Finger Licken Good, a standout production of 1976, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Horror landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into The Devil ("That's Lucifer, and don't call me Lucy. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Horror are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "The Devil ("That's Lucifer, and don't call me Lucy."), along with his personnel director Angel, enjoy each other's company, the companionship of various hand puppets and marionettes, and enthusiastic sex with a series of sexy long-haired teens. All-male version of "The Devil's Playground.""

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Despite the inherent talent of Kelly Guthrie, the performance in Finger Licken Good feels somewhat constrained by a narrative framework that doesn't fully exploit their range. There are flashes of brilliance, but the overall impact is muted.

The direction by Rik Taziner is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 65 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Finger Licken Good truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Horror, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Finger Licken Good explores the dichotomy of fear and discovery. The 1976 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Rik Taziner respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Finger Licken Good is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Kelly Guthrie or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Finger Licken Good is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.