RATING★ 5.8
WORTH IT? MAYBE
Flying Skirts backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Flying Skirts.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Flying Skirts Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1984)

Laura and Chloe go on a summer holiday in Switzerland, near the holiday home of Hugo, his wife and daughter Bridget. Chloe is Hugo's mistress. Laura telephones her boyfriend from the hotel lobby, watched by Hugo and he follows her to her room and they have sex, not realising each other's identities. Bridget helps Gabriel Pontello get away from a farmer who is chasing him. Dominique Saint Clair meets her lover Christophe Clark who is camping in a field. Laura and Chloe go for a walk and sunbathe on a bridge across a stream. Christophe spots them and sneaks up and has sex with Chloe. Gabriel Pontello has sex with Bridget as she leans out of a window talking to her mother. Laura and Chloe spy on Christophe and Dominique Saint Clair having sex in the tent. They then meet Bridget who invites them to lunch. All the cast then have lunch and then Hugo and wife drive off. The rest then party in the barn. Hugo and wife turn back and for some strange reason go into the barn ...

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Romance cinema, then Flying Skirts offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1984 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Romance films
casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Flying Skirts, a standout production of 1984, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Romance landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Laura and Chloe go on a summer holiday in Switzerland, near the holiday home of Hugo, his wife and daughter Bridget. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Romance are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Laura and Chloe go on a summer holiday in Switzerland, near the holiday home of Hugo, his wife and daughter Bridget. Chloe is Hugo's mistress. Laura telephones her boyfriend from the hotel lobby, watched by Hugo and he follows her to her room and they have sex, not realising each other's identities. Bridget helps Gabriel Pontello get away from a farmer who is chasing him. Dominique Saint Clair meets her lover Christophe Clark who is camping in a field. Laura and Chloe go for a walk and sunbathe on a bridge across a stream. Christophe spots them and sneaks up and has sex with Chloe. Gabriel Pontello has sex with Bridget as she leans out of a window talking to her mother. Laura and Chloe spy on Christophe and Dominique Saint Clair having sex in the tent. They then meet Bridget who invites them to lunch. All the cast then have lunch and then Hugo and wife drive off. The rest then party in the barn. Hugo and wife turn back and for some strange reason go into the barn ..."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The ensemble, led by Olinka Hardiman, delivers a professional and engaging performance that satisfies the requirements of the Romance genre. While it may not reinvent the wheel, the commitment to the material is evident in every frame.

The direction by Michel Lemoine is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 83 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Flying Skirts truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Romance, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 5.8/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Flying Skirts explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1984 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Michel Lemoine respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Flying Skirts serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Olinka Hardiman or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Flying Skirts is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

83MIN

At approximately 1.4 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement