RATING★ 6.4
WORTH IT? MAYBE
Going for Broke backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Going for Broke.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Going for Broke Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1977)

Three out of work actors breaks into a bank through the toilet of a railroad station....

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Comedy, Crime cinema, then Going for Broke offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1977 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Comedy films
Fans of Crime films

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1977, Going for Broke represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Comedy, Crime category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Three out of work actors breaks into a bank through the toilet of a railroad station. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Comedy, Crime are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Three out of work actors breaks into a bank through the toilet of a railroad station."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. In Going for Broke, we see Preben Kaas utilizing their established screen presence to carry the story forward. It is a solid, workmanlike performance that serves the director's vision without overshadowing the larger narrative goals.

The direction by Gabriel Axel is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 85 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Going for Broke truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Comedy, Crime, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6.4/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Going for Broke explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1977 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Gabriel Axel respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Going for Broke serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Preben Kaas or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Going for Broke is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: RECOMMENDED - QUALITY CINEMA

⏳ Time Investment

85MIN

At approximately 1.4 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement