Profit & Loss Analysis

Is Hiding Out Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1987)
A very successful stock broker is called to court to testify against a mob boss who was into some inside trading. Andrew Morenski must become Max Hauser and go back to high school ...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Action, Adventure, Comedy, Drama, Family, Thriller cinema, then Hiding Out offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1987 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Debuting in 1987, Hiding Out represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Action, Adventure, Comedy, Drama, Family, Thriller category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A very successful stock broker is called to court to testify against a mob boss who was into some inside trading. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Action, Adventure, Comedy, Drama, Family, Thriller are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A very successful stock broker is called to court to testify against a mob boss who was into some inside trading. Andrew Morenski must become Max Hauser and go back to high school for protection from the mob."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. While the script occasionally leans into familiar territory, the efforts of Jon Cryer ensure that the emotional beats of Hiding Out always land with sufficient weight. Jon Cryer provides a steady, reliable performance that anchors the film through its narrative shifts.
The direction by Bob Giraldi is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 98 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Hiding Out truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Action, Adventure, Comedy, Drama, Family, Thriller, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 5.7/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Hiding Out explores the dichotomy of strength and vulnerability. The 1987 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Bob Giraldi respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Hiding Out serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Jon Cryer or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Hiding Out is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.6 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.