RATING★ 5.0
WORTH IT? MAYBE
How to be Happy backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for How to be Happy.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is How to be Happy Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2013)

Following a bad breakup, relationship councilor Cormac Kavanagh starts sleeping with his clients in a misguided attempt to reignite their passions.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Romance, Comedy cinema, then How to be Happy offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2013 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Romance films
Fans of Comedy films
casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

How to be Happy, a standout production of 2013, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Romance, Comedy landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Following a bad breakup, relationship councilor Cormac Kavanagh starts sleeping with his clients in a misguided attempt to reignite their passions. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Romance, Comedy are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Following a bad breakup, relationship councilor Cormac Kavanagh starts sleeping with his clients in a misguided attempt to reignite their passions."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The ensemble, led by Brian Gleeson, delivers a professional and engaging performance that satisfies the requirements of the Romance, Comedy genre. While it may not reinvent the wheel, the commitment to the material is evident in every frame.

The direction by Brian O'Neill is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 80 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is How to be Happy truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Romance, Comedy, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, How to be Happy explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2013 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Brian O'Neill respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, How to be Happy is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Brian Gleeson or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, How to be Happy is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

80MIN

At approximately 1.3 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement