Profit & Loss Analysis

Is Intermission Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2003)
A raucous story of the interweaving lives and loves of small-town delinquents, shady cops, pretty good girls and very bad boys. With Irish guts and grit, lives collide, preconcepti...
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Comedy, Crime, Drama cinema, then Intermission offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2003 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
Debuting in 2003, Intermission represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Comedy, Crime, Drama category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A raucous story of the interweaving lives and loves of small-town delinquents, shady cops, pretty good girls and very bad boys. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Comedy, Crime, Drama are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A raucous story of the interweaving lives and loves of small-town delinquents, shady cops, pretty good girls and very bad boys. With Irish guts and grit, lives collide, preconceptions shatter and romance is tested to the extreme. An ill-timed and poorly executed couple's break-up sets off a chain of events affecting everyone in town."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. While the script occasionally leans into familiar territory, the efforts of Colin Farrell ensure that the emotional beats of Intermission always land with sufficient weight. Colin Farrell provides a steady, reliable performance that anchors the film through its narrative shifts.
The direction by John Crowley is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 105 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Intermission truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Comedy, Crime, Drama, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6.1/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Intermission explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2003 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and John Crowley respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Intermission serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Colin Farrell or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Intermission is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.8 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.