RATING★ 10.0
WORTH IT? YES
Le Corbusier backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Le Corbusier.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: YES
Editorial Verified

Is Le Corbusier Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1967)

Making a documentary on Le Corbusier is not easy, because he is undoubtedly the architect most familiar to the general public but also the most unknown. If most people know his great achievements, such as the Cité radieuse of Marseille, the pavilions of the Cité universitaire de Paris or the Tourettes convent, many are unaware of his works in Moscow, Rio de Janeiro or Chandigarh. Roy Oppenheim pays a vibrant tribute to Corbusier, dismissing the criticisms and darker facets of the character. It presents the career of this pioneering architect, as well as his thinking, the essential principle of which was aimed at the development of human beings and the balance of society. Light, space and greenery are integrated into his large futuristic cities, because according to him the eyes of the inhabitants should be drawn into the distance and not into their neighbor's bathroom.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

YES, ABSOLUTELY

If you are a fan of Documentary cinema, then Le Corbusier offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1967 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Documentary films
Viewers seeking quality storytelling

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

In the evolving tapestry of Documentary cinema, the 1967 release of Le Corbusier stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Making a documentary on Le Corbusier is not easy, because he is undoubtedly the architect most familiar to the general public but also the most unknown. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Documentary are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Making a documentary on Le Corbusier is not easy, because he is undoubtedly the architect most familiar to the general public but also the most unknown. If most people know his great achievements, such as the Cité radieuse of Marseille, the pavilions of the Cité universitaire de Paris or the Tourettes convent, many are unaware of his works in Moscow, Rio de Janeiro or Chandigarh. Roy Oppenheim pays a vibrant tribute to Corbusier, dismissing the criticisms and darker facets of the character. It presents the career of this pioneering architect, as well as his thinking, the essential principle of which was aimed at the development of human beings and the balance of society. Light, space and greenery are integrated into his large futuristic cities, because according to him the eyes of the inhabitants should be drawn into the distance and not into their neighbor's bathroom."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The performance by Charles-Édouard Jeanneret-Gris is nothing short of transformative, providing an emotional anchor that tethers the film's more abstract concepts to a relatable human experience. Charles-Édouard Jeanneret-Gris captures the nuance of the script with a performance that will likely define their career for years to come.

The direction by Roy Oppenheim is marked by a bold and uncompromising hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 29 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Le Corbusier truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Documentary, then this is a mandatory viewing experience, a film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.

The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 10/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Le Corbusier explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1967 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Roy Oppenheim respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Le Corbusier is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Charles-Édouard Jeanneret-Gris or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Le Corbusier is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: EXCEPTIONAL - A MUST-WATCH

⏳ Time Investment

29MIN

At approximately 0.5 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement