RATING★ 6.5
WORTH IT? MAYBE
Next Door backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Next Door.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Next Door Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1990)

An old square-headed man tries to watch TV while a little girl makes a playful ruckus outside. Preserved by the Academy Film Archive in 2006....

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Animation cinema, then Next Door offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1990 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Animation films

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1990, Next Door represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Animation category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into An old square-headed man tries to watch TV while a little girl makes a playful ruckus outside. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Animation are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "An old square-headed man tries to watch TV while a little girl makes a playful ruckus outside. Preserved by the Academy Film Archive in 2006."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. In Next Door, we see Brooke O'Neill utilizing their established screen presence to carry the story forward. It is a solid, workmanlike performance that serves the director's vision without overshadowing the larger narrative goals.

The direction by Pete Docter is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 3 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Next Door truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Animation, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6.5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Next Door explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1990 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Pete Docter respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Next Door serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Brooke O'Neill or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Next Door is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: RECOMMENDED - QUALITY CINEMA

⏳ Time Investment

3MIN

At approximately 0.1 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement