RATING★ 6.0
WORTH IT? MAYBE
Paleonaut backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Paleonaut.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Paleonaut Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2017)

A scientist studying the first human time traveller falls in love with her subject. But if her research succeeds they will become separated by eons of history. She must find a way to connect with him across the ages or lose him forever.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Science Fiction cinema, then Paleonaut offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2017 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Science Fiction films

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Paleonaut, a standout production of 2017, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Science Fiction landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A scientist studying the first human time traveller falls in love with her subject. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Science Fiction are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A scientist studying the first human time traveller falls in love with her subject. But if her research succeeds they will become separated by eons of history. She must find a way to connect with him across the ages or lose him forever."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The ensemble, led by Tomoko Hayakawa, delivers a professional and engaging performance that satisfies the requirements of the Science Fiction genre. While it may not reinvent the wheel, the commitment to the material is evident in every frame.

The direction by Eric McEver is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 16 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Paleonaut truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Science Fiction, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Paleonaut explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2017 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Eric McEver respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Paleonaut serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Tomoko Hayakawa or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Paleonaut is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: RECOMMENDED - QUALITY CINEMA

⏳ Time Investment

16MIN

At approximately 0.3 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement