RATING★ TBA
WORTH IT? NO
Smoker backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Smoker.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is Smoker Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2001)

Were you too young for the 60s, and wish you had been around when love was free and and the only kind of Aids were band-aids? Or are you a broken down warhorse who yearns to relive those carefree days when you had hair to your waist and spent your days with your head in a bong? Well, relive your golden, wasted youth as Michael Raven revisits the 60s as they never were: interracial love, lesbian lickouts, full-on orgies, and hot and cold running sluts. It's San Francisco during the Summer of Love, and even among free-loving hippies, things can get tense when Tom drops his girlfriend Candy for her best friend Adeline. As Candy is reduced to being a prostitute, she plots to get her man back. But true love isn't that simple, and plenty goes wrong as Tom and Adeline head for the wedding chapel. Michael Raven directs Sydnee Steele, Gwen Summers, Jessica Drake and Zoe in this offbeat sexual thriller that will keep you on the edge of your seat.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

SKIP IT

If you are a fan of Drama, Thriller cinema, then Smoker offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2001 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Drama films
Fans of Thriller films
casual viewers seeking light entertainment

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 2001, Smoker represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Drama, Thriller category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Were you too young for the 60s, and wish you had been around when love was free and and the only kind of Aids were band-aids? Or are you a broken down warhorse who yearns to relive those carefree days when you had hair to your waist and spent your days with your head in a bong? Well, relive your golden, wasted youth as Michael Raven revisits the 60s as they never were: interracial love, lesbian lickouts, full-on orgies, and hot and cold running sluts. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Drama, Thriller are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Were you too young for the 60s, and wish you had been around when love was free and and the only kind of Aids were band-aids? Or are you a broken down warhorse who yearns to relive those carefree days when you had hair to your waist and spent your days with your head in a bong? Well, relive your golden, wasted youth as Michael Raven revisits the 60s as they never were: interracial love, lesbian lickouts, full-on orgies, and hot and cold running sluts. It's San Francisco during the Summer of Love, and even among free-loving hippies, things can get tense when Tom drops his girlfriend Candy for her best friend Adeline. As Candy is reduced to being a prostitute, she plots to get her man back. But true love isn't that simple, and plenty goes wrong as Tom and Adeline head for the wedding chapel. Michael Raven directs Sydnee Steele, Gwen Summers, Jessica Drake and Zoe in this offbeat sexual thriller that will keep you on the edge of your seat."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The presence of April Flowers provides a necessary level of professionalism to the production, even when the underlying script struggles to maintain a consistent tone. It is a testament to their skill that they remain the most engaging element of the film.

The direction by Michael Raven is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 90 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Smoker truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Drama, Thriller, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Smoker explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 2001 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Michael Raven respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Smoker is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of April Flowers or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Smoker is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: INTERESTING - VIEW WITH CAUTION

⏳ Time Investment

90MIN

At approximately 1.5 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement