RATING★ 6.2
WORTH IT? MAYBE
The Man with the Suitcase backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for The Man with the Suitcase.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is The Man with the Suitcase Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1983)

A sensitivity to sounds coming from the activities of an unwelcome guest in the close quarters of an apartment is only one important component in this atmospheric, avant-garde drollery by Chantal Akerman. When the apartment owner comes home, her guest is settled in and at first, the slightly reclusive host decides simply to eat her breakfast in her room instead of having to face morning conversation with her guest. Sounds of the toilet flushing, the bath water running and splashing, footsteps pacing, and furniture moving invade the hostess' refuge in her bedroom like the frontrunners of an all-out offensive. She locks herself up for 28 days, life's detritus accumulating around her, just so she does not have to go out to face the nemesis that lurks beyond her door.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of TV Movie, Comedy cinema, then The Man with the Suitcase offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1983 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of TV Movie films
Fans of Comedy films

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1983, The Man with the Suitcase represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the TV Movie, Comedy category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A sensitivity to sounds coming from the activities of an unwelcome guest in the close quarters of an apartment is only one important component in this atmospheric, avant-garde drollery by Chantal Akerman. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of TV Movie, Comedy are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A sensitivity to sounds coming from the activities of an unwelcome guest in the close quarters of an apartment is only one important component in this atmospheric, avant-garde drollery by Chantal Akerman. When the apartment owner comes home, her guest is settled in and at first, the slightly reclusive host decides simply to eat her breakfast in her room instead of having to face morning conversation with her guest. Sounds of the toilet flushing, the bath water running and splashing, footsteps pacing, and furniture moving invade the hostess' refuge in her bedroom like the frontrunners of an all-out offensive. She locks herself up for 28 days, life's detritus accumulating around her, just so she does not have to go out to face the nemesis that lurks beyond her door."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The ensemble, led by Chantal Akerman, delivers a professional and engaging performance that satisfies the requirements of the TV Movie, Comedy genre. While it may not reinvent the wheel, the commitment to the material is evident in every frame.

The direction by Chantal Akerman is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 61 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is The Man with the Suitcase truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of TV Movie, Comedy, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6.2/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, The Man with the Suitcase explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1983 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Chantal Akerman respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, The Man with the Suitcase serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Chantal Akerman or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, The Man with the Suitcase is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: RECOMMENDED - QUALITY CINEMA

⏳ Time Investment

61MIN

At approximately 1.0 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement