Is The Waxing Moon Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1976)
A botanist has developed a curious flower which only blooms during a full moon and has remarkable properties, instantly healing wounds and giving the strange ability to read other's thoughts. He uses it to rejuvenate his crippled body and sets his sights on his beautiful young assistant.
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Horror cinema, then The Waxing Moon offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1976 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
In the evolving tapestry of Horror cinema, the 1976 release of The Waxing Moon stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A botanist has developed a curious flower which only blooms during a full moon and has remarkable properties, instantly healing wounds and giving the strange ability to read other's thoughts. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Horror are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A botanist has developed a curious flower which only blooms during a full moon and has remarkable properties, instantly healing wounds and giving the strange ability to read other's thoughts. He uses it to rejuvenate his crippled body and sets his sights on his beautiful young assistant."
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Maria DeFalco does an admirable job with the material provided, but one can't help but feel that a more daring directorial approach would have yielded a more impactful result. It is a competent but ultimately standard genre performance.
The direction by Jeremy Kay is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 96 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is The Waxing Moon truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Horror, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, The Waxing Moon explores the dichotomy of fear and discovery. The 1976 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Jeremy Kay respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, The Waxing Moon is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Maria DeFalco or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, The Waxing Moon is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.6 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.