Is To Be Twenty in the Aures Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1972)

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1972, To Be Twenty in the Aures represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Drama, War category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A group of refractory and pacifist Bretons is sent to Algeria. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Drama, War are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A group of refractory and pacifist Bretons is sent to Algeria. These beings confronted with the horrors of war gradually become killing machines. One of them did not accept it and deserted, taking with him an FLN prisoner who was to be executed the next day."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The performance by Philippe Léotard is nothing short of transformative, providing an emotional anchor that tethers the film's more abstract concepts to a relatable human experience. Philippe Léotard captures the nuance of the script with a performance that will likely define their career for years to come.

The direction by René Vautier is marked by a steady and professional hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 100 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is To Be Twenty in the Aures truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Drama, War, then this is a mandatory viewing experience, a film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.

The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 7.5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, To Be Twenty in the Aures explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1972 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and René Vautier respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, To Be Twenty in the Aures is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Philippe Léotard or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, To Be Twenty in the Aures is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.