RATING★ 8.8
WORTH IT? YES
Traffic: Live at Santa Monica backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for Traffic: Live at Santa Monica.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: YES
Editorial Verified

Is Traffic: Live at Santa Monica Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1972)

Traffic left behind precious few concert videos in any form, so this show, from the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, is an intrinsically valuable document of the band, even though it does feature a later lineup: Steve Winwood, Jim Capaldi, Chris Wood, Rebop Kwakubaah, Roger Hawkins, and David Hood. Chronologically, the show comes roughly a year later than the Welcome to the Canteen album. There are some many wonderful shots of the band members from varied angles and all kinds of different lighting, even within the same song, courtesy of video producer Taylor Hackford (White Nights, Against All Odds) but, in fact, this wasn't the ideal version of the group to capture on stage: Winwood had suffered a serious illness the year before, the group was always in a state of flux as far as its line-up was concerned, and they were entering the period of decline that would coincide with the recording of Shootout at the Fantasy Factory.

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

YES, ABSOLUTELY

If you are a fan of Music cinema, then Traffic: Live at Santa Monica offers a fresh and engaging experience that justifies its existence in the 1972 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Music films
Viewers seeking quality storytelling

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Traffic: Live at Santa Monica, a standout production of 1972, meticulously weaves its narrative threads through the Music landscape, offering a cinematic experience that is as challenging as it is rewarding. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Traffic left behind precious few concert videos in any form, so this show, from the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, is an intrinsically valuable document of the band, even though it does feature a later lineup: Steve Winwood, Jim Capaldi, Chris Wood, Rebop Kwakubaah, Roger Hawkins, and David Hood. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Music are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Traffic left behind precious few concert videos in any form, so this show, from the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, is an intrinsically valuable document of the band, even though it does feature a later lineup: Steve Winwood, Jim Capaldi, Chris Wood, Rebop Kwakubaah, Roger Hawkins, and David Hood. Chronologically, the show comes roughly a year later than the Welcome to the Canteen album. There are some many wonderful shots of the band members from varied angles and all kinds of different lighting, even within the same song, courtesy of video producer Taylor Hackford (White Nights, Against All Odds) but, in fact, this wasn't the ideal version of the group to capture on stage: Winwood had suffered a serious illness the year before, the group was always in a state of flux as far as its line-up was concerned, and they were entering the period of decline that would coincide with the recording of Shootout at the Fantasy Factory."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. Audiences are treated to a masterclass in acting by Steve Winwood, whose portrayal of the protagonist is imbued with a depth and vulnerability that is rare in contemporary Music. The chemistry with the supporting players is palpable, creating a gravity that pulls the viewer into the screen.

The direction by Allan Muir is marked by a bold and uncompromising hand. Technically, the film is a tour de force. The cinematography makes exceptional use of light and shadow, creating a visual language that mirrors the character's internal journey. The soundscape is equally impressive, with a score that is both haunting and celebratory, perfectly aligned with the thematic progression of the plot. The pacing, over its 65 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Traffic: Live at Santa Monica truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Music, then this is a mandatory viewing experience, a film that will haunt your thoughts long after you leave the theater.

The film's ability to transcend its genre labels is why it has earned its 8.8/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Traffic: Live at Santa Monica explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1972 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Allan Muir respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Traffic: Live at Santa Monica is a rare gem that rewards the audience's attention with a profound and lasting impact. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Steve Winwood or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Traffic: Live at Santa Monica is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: EXCEPTIONAL - A MUST-WATCH

⏳ Time Investment

65MIN

At approximately 1.1 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement