Is Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1977)
Gérard Courant applies the Lettrist editing techniques of Isidore Isou to footage of late 70's pop culture. Courant posits that his cinema offers an aggressive détournement to the French mainstream, reifying a Duchampian view of film: "I believe in impossible movies and works without meaning... I believe in the anti-movie. I believe in the non-movie. I believe in Urgent... My first full length movie that is so anti-everything that I sometimes wonder if it really does exist!"
✨ The Quick Verdict
If you are a fan of Documentary cinema, then Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 1977 landscape.
👥 Target Audience
📔 Detailed Analysis
The Narrative Arc & Core Premise
In the evolving tapestry of Documentary cinema, the 1977 release of Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Gérard Courant applies the Lettrist editing techniques of Isidore Isou to footage of late 70's pop culture. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Documentary are tested.
The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Gérard Courant applies the Lettrist editing techniques of Isidore Isou to footage of late 70's pop culture. Courant posits that his cinema offers an aggressive détournement to the French mainstream, reifying a Duchampian view of film: "I believe in impossible movies and works without meaning... I believe in the anti-movie. I believe in the non-movie. I believe in Urgent... My first full length movie that is so anti-everything that I sometimes wonder if it really does exist!""
Artistic Execution & Performance Study
A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. While the script occasionally leans into familiar territory, the efforts of John Lennon ensure that the emotional beats of Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante always land with sufficient weight. John Lennon provides a steady, reliable performance that anchors the film through its narrative shifts.
The direction by Gérard Courant is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 102 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.
Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch
Is Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Documentary, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.
The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 5.5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.
Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision
At a deeper level, Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1977 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Gérard Courant respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.
The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.
Final Editorial Recommendation
Ultimately, Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of John Lennon or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Urgent ou à quoi bon exécuter des projets puisque le projet est en lui-même une jouissance suffisante is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.
⏳ Time Investment
At approximately 1.7 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.