RATING★ 6.6
WORTH IT? MAYBE
What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires backdrop
🏆

Expert Review & Ratings

See our full critical analysis and audience score for What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires.

View Review →
WORTH WATCHING: MIXED
Editorial Verified

Is What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2005)

Who says being an undead creature of the night is easy? With that in mind, three ancient friends—centuries-old vampires Vulvus, the romantic and temperamental Lord Byron wannabe; Viago, the flamboyant 19th-century dandy; and Deacon, the rebellious 107-year-old youngster—invite a documentary crew to shed light on a vampire’s daily life. Starting from the fateful day of their eternal transformation, these modern-day blood-suckers don’t shy away from answering deeply personal questions about their quirky flatmate situation—after all, this is an interview, not just an excuse for a quick bite.Will we ever truly find out what vampires do in the shadows?

Advertisement

✨ The Quick Verdict

ONE-TIME WATCH

If you are a fan of Comedy, Horror cinema, then What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires offers a standard experience that justifies its existence in the 2005 landscape.

Advertisement

👥 Target Audience

Fans of Comedy films
Fans of Horror films

📔 Detailed Analysis

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

In the evolving tapestry of Comedy, Horror cinema, the 2005 release of What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Who says being an undead creature of the night is easy? With that in mind, three ancient friends—centuries-old vampires Vulvus, the romantic and temperamental Lord Byron wannabe; Viago, the flamboyant 19th-century dandy; and Deacon, the rebellious 107-year-old youngster—invite a documentary crew to shed light on a vampire’s daily life. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Comedy, Horror are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Who says being an undead creature of the night is easy? With that in mind, three ancient friends—centuries-old vampires Vulvus, the romantic and temperamental Lord Byron wannabe; Viago, the flamboyant 19th-century dandy; and Deacon, the rebellious 107-year-old youngster—invite a documentary crew to shed light on a vampire’s daily life. Starting from the fateful day of their eternal transformation, these modern-day blood-suckers don’t shy away from answering deeply personal questions about their quirky flatmate situation—after all, this is an interview, not just an excuse for a quick bite.Will we ever truly find out what vampires do in the shadows?"

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. While the script occasionally leans into familiar territory, the efforts of Taika Waititi ensure that the emotional beats of What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires always land with sufficient weight. Taika Waititi provides a steady, reliable performance that anchors the film through its narrative shifts.

The direction by Jemaine Clement is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 28 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Comedy, Horror, then this is a highly recommended entry that delivers on its promises while offering a few surprises along the way.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 6.6/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires explores the dichotomy of fear and discovery. The 2005 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Jemaine Clement respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires serves as a reliable piece of entertainment that will satisfy core fans while providing a solid entry point for new viewers. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Taika Waititi or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, What We Do in the Shadows: Interviews with Some Vampires is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.

Official movieMx Verdict: RECOMMENDED - QUALITY CINEMA

⏳ Time Investment

28MIN

At approximately 0.5 hours, the film requires a standard time commitment.

Advertisement