Is When we met Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (2018)

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

In the evolving tapestry of Horror cinema, the 2018 release of When we met stands as a landmark endeavor that pushes the boundaries of conventional storytelling. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into Yuki Inoue was arrested on suspicion where she bit off a man's genitalia. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Horror are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "Yuki Inoue was arrested on suspicion where she bit off a man's genitalia. However, she had absolutely no recollection of any such incident. And also Hiroaki Ishida, a police inspector in Shibuya police station, involved continuous bizarre case when he investigated her. It seemed that his "EGO" couldn't control his "ID". Ryoko Minami, who came from the first investigation division, tried to inject a benzodiazepine class anxiolytic agent into herself to build the same situation of Hiroaki Ishida. Because she wanted to know the fact in his case. At that time, she watched another Ryoko Minami who removed her own uterus with her bare hands. Then the trail of Yuki Inoue started. Did the unreasonable truth reveal in the trial?."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. The presence of Kaori Abe provides a necessary level of professionalism to the production, even when the underlying script struggles to maintain a consistent tone. It is a testament to their skill that they remain the most engaging element of the film.

The direction by Tomoyoshi Sugiura is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 30 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is When we met truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Horror, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 0/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, When we met explores the dichotomy of fear and discovery. The 2018 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Tomoyoshi Sugiura respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, When we met is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Kaori Abe or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, When we met is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.