Is Women's Things Worth Watching? Honest Movie Review & Audience Verdict (1978)

The Narrative Arc & Core Premise

Debuting in 1978, Women's Things represents a sophisticated intersection of artistic ambition and genre-defining elements within the Documentary, Drama category. The primary thematic concern of the film is an investigation into A young sociology student has an unintended pregnancy and is subjected to the terrible humiliation of an incompetent doctor. As the story unfolds, we are introduced to a world where the traditional boundaries of Documentary, Drama are tested.

The screenplay takes its time to establish the stakes, ensuring that every character motivation is grounded in a psychological reality. The synopsis only hints at the depth: "A young sociology student has an unintended pregnancy and is subjected to the terrible humiliation of an incompetent doctor. The girl falls ill from the poorly performed abortion and is taken by a friend to the General Hospital. Film that reports clandestine abortion in Mexico, with interviews with women who have had abortions in that hospital and shocking maternal death statistics from procedures carried out under unsafe conditions."

Artistic Execution & Performance Study

A film's resonance is often dictated by the strength of its execution, both in front of and behind the camera. While the script occasionally leans into familiar territory, the efforts of Patricia Luke ensure that the emotional beats of Women's Things always land with sufficient weight. Patricia Luke provides a steady, reliable performance that anchors the film through its narrative shifts.

The direction by Rosa Martha Fernández is marked by a steady and professional hand. From a production standpoint, the film meets the high standards of modern industrial filmmaking. The sets are well-crafted, and the visual effects are integrated with a level of polish that ensures the viewer matches the director's intended level of immersion. While perhaps not groundbreaking, the execution is flawless. The pacing, over its 45 minute runtime, allows the audience to fully inhabit the space the director has created, making the eventual resolution feel deeply earned.

Critical Assessment: Why You Should Watch

Is Women's Things truly worth your investment of time and attention? In an era of disposable content, this film makes a strong case for its existence. If you are a connoisseur of Documentary, Drama, then this is a worthwhile watch if you have a specific interest in the themes or the performers involved.

The film's ability to perfectly execute its genre requirements is why it has earned its 5/10 score. It speaks to a global audience while maintaining a distinct and unique voice, a balance that is notoriously difficult to achieve in the modern marketplace.

Philosophical Subtext & Directorial Vision

At a deeper level, Women's Things explores the dichotomy of truth and perception. The 1978 audience is increasingly sophisticated, and Rosa Martha Fernández respects this by refusing to provide easy answers to the story's complex questions.

The philosophical underpinnings of the second and third acts suggest a narrative that is interested in more than just entertainment. It is an exploration of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.

Final Editorial Recommendation

Ultimately, Women's Things is an interesting experiment that, while flawed, offers enough moments of creative spark to be worth a casual glance for the curious. Whether you are drawn to it by the star power of Patricia Luke or the critical acclaim surrounding its release, Women's Things is a film that demands to be seen on the largest screen possible.